_____________________________________________________ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED: February 3, 1993 _____________________________________________________ GSBCA 9556-R, 9598-R AIR INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Donald A. Dean, President of Air Inc., appearing for Appellant. John E. Cornell, Office of General Counsel, Personal Property Division, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges LaBELLA, HENDLEY, and VERGILIO. VERGILIO, Board Judge. On January 15, 1993, the Board received from Air Inc. a motion for reconsideration, Rule 32, of the Board's denial of its underlying appeals, Air Inc. v. General Services Administration, GSBCA 9556, 9598 (Dec. 16, 1992). The contractor raises what it asserts to be "facts relevant to this appeal" which have been omitted from the decision. In addition to reaching factual conclusions different from those of the Board, the contractor attempts to move into the record assertions not previously introduced. Moreover, the contractor continues to maintain that the actions of the administrative contracting officer were arbitrary and capricious, and constituted an abuse of discretion. The agency contends that the motion should be denied--the contractor has not raised a valid basis for reconsideration. The contractor has failed to establish a valid basis for reconsideration. Rules 32, 33. It attempts simply to relitigate factual and legal issues on which it failed to prevail. Accordingly, the Board DENIES the motion for reconsideration. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge We concur: _____________________________ _____________________________ VINCENT A. LaBELLA JAMES W. HENDLEY Board Judge Board Judge