_______________________________________________
 
             DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 27, 1993
            _______________________________________________
 
 
                             GSBCA 12535-P
 
 
                    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
 
                                                Respondent.
 
        Shelton H.  Skolnick, Judy D.  Leishman, and Amy M.  Hall of
   Skolnick & Leishman, P.C., Derwood, MD, counsel for Protester.
 
        Stephen  G. Lee,  Office of the  General Counsel,  Office of
   Personnel Management, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
     
   HENDLEY, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On August  12, 1993, the  Board docketed a protest  filed by
   Integrated Systems Group, Inc. (ISG).  The protester alleged that
   the respondent, Office  of Personnel  Management (OPM),  violated
   applicable statute  and regulation  in the  process of  procuring
   automatic  data processing  equipment  for use  by  the OPM  Data
   Center,  Macon,   Georgia.     The  respondent's   delegation  of
   procurement authority was not suspended.
 
        A  merits  hearing  was  held  on  September  17,  1993,  in
   Washington, DC.   After the close  of business  on that day,  the
   parties held a telephone conference  and informed the Board  that
   they  had settled  the protest  and that  the hearing,  which was
   scheduled to continue  on September 18, could be  cancelled.  The
   Board then cancelled the hearing.
 
        On  September 24, 1993,  the Board received  the protester's
   motion to dismiss, which states:
 
              Integrated  Systems  Group,   Inc.  ("Protester")
        hereby  withdraws its  protest  and  requests that  the
        General  Services  Administration   Board  of  Contract
        Appeals dismiss the protest with prejudice.
 
              The   counsel  for   the   Office  of   Personnel
        Management  ("Respondent") is aware  of this motion and
        has no objection to the motion.
 
        Accordingly,  the protest is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  Rule
   28(a).
   ______________________________________
 
                                JAMES W. HENDLEY
                                Board Judge