May 1, 1997 GSBCA 13646-RELO In the Matter of MICHAEL L. MORGAN Michael L. Morgan, Marina, CA, Claimant. Tsgt. Judith Vera, Chief, Travel Office, Beale Air Force Base, CA, appearing for Department of the Air Force. DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman). Michael L. Morgan, an automotive mechanic, was transferred in the interest of the Government from Fort Ord, California, to Beale Air Force Base, California, in January of 1994. Mr. Morgan's permanent change of station orders authorized reimbursement of temporary quarters subsistence expenses (TQSE) incurred for a period of 60 days for Mr. Morgan, his wife, his daughter, and his stepson. Although Mr. Morgan filed two separate vouchers for reimbursement of TQSE, the Department of the Air Force has never made payment in response to either of them. There is a long and tortuous history to this matter. Many actors have had a role in the drama, but none has been helpful in addressing the merits of Mr. Morgan's requests for payment. We conclude, based on the scant information provided by the claimant, that the claim must be denied in large part. On March 16, 1994, Mr. Morgan submitted to the Air Force a voucher for TQSE for himself and his three dependents for the period from January 11 through March 7, 1994. He asked to be paid $7,062.16 -- $560 for lodging, $6,305.89 for meals, and $196.27 for laundry. The Air Force personnel who received the voucher considered the amounts claimed in it to be excessive. At their request, the agency's Office of Special Investigations (OSI) conducted a formal investigation of relevant matters. OSI filed a report which included some findings, but came to no particular conclusion as to whether payment should be made in the amount requested. The Air Force provided the report to us with a cover letter which says that the report "may not be further disseminated without the express written concurrence of [OSI]." We do not rely on the report for anything other than (a) its presentation of copies of the voucher submitted by Mr. Morgan and (b) its admission that Mr. Morgan gave the Air Force receipts relating to the amounts noted in the voucher, but the agency travel office lost those receipts. In October 1994, Mr. Morgan filed a claim with the General Accounting Office (GAO) for TQSE associated with his transfer to Beale Air Force Base. This claim seeks reimbursement in the amount of $3,052 -- $560 for lodging, $2,352 for meals, and $140 for laundry. GAO took no action on the claim. In July 1996, the authority to settle claims against the Government relating to relocation expenses of federal civilian employees was transferred from GAO to this Board. Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-53,  211, 109 Stat. 514, 535 (1995); Determination by Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget (June 28, 1996); Delegation of Authority from the Acting Administrator of General Services (July 17, 1996); General Accounting Office Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-316,  202(n), 110 Stat. 3826, 3843 (1996). GAO then sent this claim to us for resolution. During the nearly two years that this claim was before GAO, that office asked the Department of Defense (DoD) for a response on four separate occasions. The department never responded. We have asked the department on numerous occasions to provide its views on the claim. The only substantive reply has been a submission of the 1994 investigative report. We cautioned Mr. Morgan that the justification and documentation supporting the claim were not clear, and asked him to provide whatever further justification and documentation he had. Mr. Morgan explained in detail how he believed the Air Force had not treated him fairly, particularly with regard to this claim. He provided only a small amount of information regarding the claim itself, however. As best as we can piece together the background of this matter, the relevant facts are as follows. When Mr. Morgan was transferred to Beale Air Force Base, his family remained behind in Marina, California. While at Beale from January 11 to March 7, Mr. Morgan stayed in a campground nearby. The rest of the family moved in with Mrs. Morgan's parents in Marina. According to Mr. Morgan, the family planned to have its house renovated for sale during the first half of 1994, and then, after his stepson had finished high school, sell the house and move to the Beale area. By May, however, he had become "fairly disgusted with the Air Force," so he moved his family back into its house and began looking for work in the Marina area. In September, he found employment there with the Navy and moved back home on a permanent basis. The Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) and the Defense Department's Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), which amplify the FTR for application to DoD civilian personnel, both limit reimbursement for TQSE in three ways: first, costs claimed must have been actually incurred; second, those costs must also have been reasonably incurred; and third, for certain types of expenses (including lodging), receipts must be provided. Guy E. Mercier, GSBCA 13795-RELO (Mar. 20, 1997); Suzanne G. Wade, GSBCA 13720-RELO, 97-1 BCA  28,706 (1996); Kevin S. Foster, GSBCA 13639-RELO, 97-1 BCA  28,688 (1996); 41 CFR 302-5.4(a) (1993); JTR C13000. In this case, since the Air Force lost Mr. Morgan's receipts, we will not apply the third limitation. The first two, however, remain critical considerations in our evaluation of the merits of this claim. The only item for which Mr. Morgan seeks reimbursement which has been explained in his filing with GAO and letters to us is lodging. He states that he stayed in a campground during the period of time in which he claims TQSE, and spent $10 per night, or $560 in all, there. This item addresses an actual cost, and $10 per night to stay in a campground is a reasonable amount. We therefore direct the Air Force to reimburse Mr. Morgan for this expense. Although we asked Mr. Morgan to tell us why he should recover the other costs he allegedly incurred, the claimant has provided no justification for these items. As to meals, in his initial voucher, he asserts that he spent $6,305.89 for home-prepared meals. In his claim to GAO, he asks for $10 for each breakfast, $14 for each lunch, and $18 for each dinner, over a fifty-six day period; he does not say whether these costs were for home-prepared or restaurant meals. We have no idea how the first and second sets of figures relate to each other. The first amount, which averages $112.61 per day, is outlandish. The second, which is based on identical costs for each meal on each day, fails to persuade us that it reflects actual expenses; the likelihood that every one of Mr. Morgan's dinners, for example, cost precisely the same as every other dinner he ate over a two-month period is remote. Similarly, with regard to the amount claimed for coin-operated laundry, we have no idea who spent the stated amounts for what cleaning at what locations. We have no doubt that Mr. Morgan actually ate meals and did laundry during the fifty-six days for which he seeks reimbursement of expenses. Because he has not established that he actually and reasonably incurred any particular amounts of expenses, however, we conclude that the agency has properly not reimbursed the alleged meal and laundry costs. Luther R. Dixon, GSBCA 13694-RELO (Apr. 4, 1997). _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge