______________ March 31, 1997 ______________ GSBCA 13655-RELO In the Matter of ROBERT C. BERG Robert C. Berg, APO Area Europe, Claimant. Ms. Anderson, 266th Theatre Finance Center, Department of the Army, Heidelberg, Germany, appearing for Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. As a civilian employee, Mr. Robert C. Berg, the claimant, changed duty stations within Germany. The agency authorized reimbursement of expenses incurred for the shipment of household goods weighing up to 18,000 pounds. Shipped goods weighed 23,601 pounds, instead of 12,000 pounds, as estimated by an agency counselor based upon the claimant's verbal description. The agency has assessed Mr. Berg $1,322.74 for the excess weight. Mr. Berg seeks a cancellation/refund of the amount; he claims the weight error was "completely attributable to misinformation and misrepresentation" by the agency counselor who provided the estimate, such that he should not be responsible for the charge. Statute and regulation require Mr. Berg to bear the expense of the excess weight. The claimant maintains that he relied on an estimate from the agency that he had approximately 12,000 pounds of goods to be moved. The estimate was based solely upon the claimant's recital of the amount and types of property to be moved, not upon a visual inspection. The total shipping weight of 23,601 pounds exceeded the 18,000 pound limitation; the agency has held the claimant liable for charges for the excess weight. The claimant asserts that the assessment of overweight charges is unfair and unjust, as he could have disposed of goods and arranged alternative means of transportation had the initial estimate been accurate. The submissions suggest that the claimant has disagreed with the actual weight determinations. The agency conducted a recalculation of the amount and weight of the property moved. It found no discrepancies in the weight. The submissions indicate that 23,601 pounds of household goods were moved. The agency recognizes that the "shipment without any doubt was grossly underestimated by" the agency counselor. It further notes that the carrier "stated that during the premove inspection [it] already estimated an amount of 24-25 van meters (approx. 24,000 lbs). Eight pages of an inventory were needed and the total cubic feet for all items is 3,248 cuft. To achieve the constructive weight this figure is to be multiplied by 7 which is a total of 22,736 lbs." Although not relevant to this determination, it is unclear when, or if, the carrier informed the claimant of its weight estimate; the claimant may have had the opportunity to utilize alternate means for transportation or chosen sale or disposal, in order to stay within the 18,000 pounds. Statute authorizes an agency to pay for the transportation of (and related activities involving) household goods and personal effects not in excess of 18,000 pounds net weight. 5 U.S.C.  5724(a)(2) (1994). The statute provides no authority for payment of costs for the movement of materials in excess of 18,000 pounds. The Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), applicable to Department of Defense civilian employees, implement the statute. The JTR specify that the maximum weight of household goods that may be transported or stored at Government expense is limited to 18,000 pounds net weight. JTR C8000-A. For all weight in excess of the authorized allowance, the employee must pay excess weight charges. JTR C8002- B.1. Erroneous estimates by an agency employee do not alter the Government's obligations and authority under the statute and regulation. Mr. Berg is responsible for the assessed excess weight charges. He received the benefit of the movement of his belongings. He is obligated to reimburse the agency for the charges. _______________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge