_____________ April 9, 1997 _____________ GSBCA 13689-RELO In the Matter of ROBERT S. HICKMAN Robert S. Hickman, Triangle, VA, Claimant. Vincent Mullally, Accounting Operations Center, National Park Service, Washington, DC, appearing for Department of the Interior. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The claimant, Mr. Robert S. Hickman, changed permanent duty stations and received reimbursement for 120 days of temporary quarters subsistence expense (TQSE). The agency disallowed reimbursement of any TQSE for his wife and two children, because their claimed period of TQSE reimbursement began after the claimant's period had expired. The agency properly denied reimbursement; regulation dictates that the periods for TQSE allowance must run concurrently for the employee and dependents. Mr. Hickman's original travel authorization specified, "Due to School and Job commitments, the employee's family is hereby authorized for Separate Travel. This has been determined to be advantageous for the Gov't, for the family will not require Temporary Quarters." And, "Since family will join employee later, it is not anticipated they will incur any Temp. Qtrs." The agency authorized thirty days of TQSE for the employee, but not his wife, son, or daughter. Subsequent authorizations extended the TQSE period for Mr. Hickman to a 120-day period, expiring on February 26, 1995. In January 1995, Mr. Hickman inquired of the agency whether his family would be entitled to reimbursement for TQSE, even though his 120-day period would expire on February 26. The agency orally advised that the periods could be separate for an employee and his family. In a written request for TQSE for his family, however, Mr. Hickman makes no mention that his TQSE period is distinct from his family's or that his TQSE would expire prior to the start date for his family's claimed TQSE. The agency provided Mr. Hickman a memorandum, dated January 31, 1995, approving the written request for TQSE for his family. The memorandum specifies that the approval is in accordance with part 302.5 of the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR), and that this "will bring your family's temporary quarters to 30 days. Please note that eligibility for reimbursement of quarters and subsistence expense begins when your family vacates the former residence, and extensions beyond the first 30 days must be submitted in written form and approved by the Service for reimbursement. Eligibility for reimbursement of quarters and subsistence expense ends upon occupancy of your new residence." On March 13, 1995, the agency's Accounting Operations Center received a request to issue a travel advance to Mr. Hickman for his family's TQSE for the thirty-day period beginning March 25. On approximately March 28, the agency denied the request, because the period of eligibility had expired when Mr. Hickman completed his 120-day period. Thereafter, Mr. Hickman requested an extension, of an additional thirty-day period for his family, which the agency did not approve. The agency denied a subsequent request for TQSE for the family for the period of March 25 through May 31. Mr. Hickman claims entitlement to reimbursement for his family's TQSE. He maintains that he received and relied upon a written statement that he and his family could have separate 120- day subsistence periods. He contends that he should not be held financially responsible because he received bad advice. Regarding compensation for TQSE, the FTR specifies that the "time period shall run concurrently for the employee and all members of the immediate family. . . . The period of eligibility shall terminate when the employee or any member of the immediate family occupies permanent residence quarters or when the authorized period of time expires, whichever occurs first." 41 CFR 302-5.2(f) (1996). The agency correctly disallowed reimbursement for the family, because the period of eligibility expired 120 days after Mr. Hickman began his TQSE period. Regulation does not permit the agency to reimburse the requested costs, regardless of the advice provided to Mr. Hickman. Moreover, the submissions do not support Mr. Hickman's assertions as to the contents of the written approval. His written request makes no mention of his TQSE period or of it expiring before the period sought for his family. The approval references the regulation which reveals the limitations on recovery. Mr. Hickman is not entitled to be reimbursed for any TQSE for his family. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge