______________ March 31, 1997 ______________ GSBCA 13700-RELO In the Matter of THOMAS H. POTTS Thomas H. Potts, Fallon, NV, Claimant. Judy Hughes, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Columbus Center, Columbus, Ohio, appearing for Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The claimant, Thomas H. Potts, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, changed permanent duty stations. The agency authorized reimbursement of temporary quarters subsistence expenses (TQSE) for up to sixty days, but denied the claimant's request for an extension. The claimant here contests that determination not to extend the period for reimbursement. The submissions reveal no violation by the agency in denying the request. The claimant is not entitled to the reimbursement he seeks. As part of a permanent change of station, the agency provided Mr. Potts travel authorization for reimbursement of TQSE for a period of sixty days. Mr. Potts began his initial TQSE period on September 21, 1993. He interrupted this period for official temporary duty (TDY) assignments and leave of an unstated basis. It is unclear how the agency reimbursed him in light of the regulatory requirement that the TQSE period is to run consecutively, except for travel time (not here relevant), circumstances attributable to official necessity, or for non- official necessary interruptions beyond the employee's control and acceptable to the Department of Defense (DOD) component concerned. Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) C13005-A.1. The initial period affects both his initial reimbursement and that specifically at issue here. Mr. Potts views the initial period as expiring on December 2, 1993. Mr. Potts delayed placing his residence at the old duty station on the market for sale. In requesting an extension of the TQSE period, he informed the agency by letter dated December 3, 1993, that after waiting to learn whether he may be eligible for a Government program to assist in the sale, he decided to use a realtor. The realtor advised to list the home after January 1, 1994. Mr. Potts so waited to list his house which he sold in May 1994. He attributes the delay to poor market conditions for house sales. Mr. Potts states that his supervisor and department head recommended approving the requested extension, as indicated in memoranda dated December 8, 1993. On May 11, 1994, with the signatures of a requesting official, an approving official (a Comptroller), and an authorizing official (Director, Financial Management Division), the agency authorized TQSE for a period totalling 120 days. In August 1994, and thereafter, the agency, through a disbursing official, has refused to pay the claim for the additional TQSE period because the justification for the extension is "doubtful." Consistent with statute, 5 U.S.C.  5724a(a)(3) (1994), the JTR specify that an employee is not automatically entitled to reimbursement of temporary quarters subsistence expenses (TQSE) for any given period. An agency will authorize reimbursement, for a period not to exceed sixty days, "only as an expedient and only for the period of time that occupancy of temporary quarters is actually necessary. The administrative determination as to whether the occupancy of temporary quarters is necessary and the length of time for occupancy shall be made on an individual-case basis." JTR C13004-A.1 (initial period of TQSE allowance). An extension of the TQSE period beyond the initial sixty days is also not automatic. While the same considerations apply to the determination regarding an extension, as for the initial TQSE period, in order to authorize an extension, the agency must determine that there are compelling reasons for the continued occupancy of temporary quarters, which are due to circumstances occurring during the initial sixty-day period and which are beyond the control of the claimant and acceptable to the Department of Defense component. Moreover, "authorization to extend the temporary quarters period and the number of days authorized will be held to a minimum." JTR C13004- A.2 (additional period of temporary quarters). The regulations address when the period of TQSE allowance shall be reduced or avoided and who is to make the determination: "The travel-approving official of the DOD component concerned will ensure the necessity and length of time for which TQSEs are authorized and justified." JTR C13004-B. The claimant has not demonstrated his entitlement to the requested TQSE extension or that the disbursing official was not the appropriate "travel-approving official" to make the determination to reduce or avoid the entire additional period of sixty days. The agency is not obligated to extend a TQSE period; the disbursing official considered and rejected as inadequate the reasons Mr. Potts asserts in support of the extension. Moreover, given that the authorization for the extended period did not occur until May 1994, the claimant could not have relied on that authorization for any of his actions and determinations. The submissions do not demonstrate any impropriety in the agency conclusion that the circumstances do not warrant an extension of the TQSE period beyond the initial sixty days. Accordingly, the claimant is not entitled to recover the amount he seeks. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge