_________________ February 20, 1997 _________________ GSBCA 13715-RELO In the Matter of JOHN R. MASSEY John R. Massey, Indianapolis, IN, Claimant. Judy Hughes, Travel Policy Branch, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Columbus, OH, appearing for the Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The claimant, Mr. John R. Massey, a Department of Defense civilian employee during the relevant period of time, seeks to recover $2,100 per month as his actual expense for renting rooms, as opposed to the $1,000 per month permitted by the agency as reasonable, for temporary quarters. Mr. Massey, who established his rental rate at a private home based on prices at commercial facilities, has not demonstrated entitlement to additional money under applicable regulations. Mr. Massey changed official duty stations, from Korea to Indiana, with a reporting date of January 22, 1996. The agency authorized temporary quarters subsistence expenses (TQSE) for Mr. Massey and two dependents (a wife and a step-son). At his new location, Mr. Massey secured rooms at a private residence, from individuals who had not previously rented rooms. The owners initially intended to rent each of two rooms for $500 per month per person. Mr. Massey paid $2,100 as the thirty day rate for the two rooms for the family. Mr. Massey explains how this rate was agreed upon: "I established a rental rate of $70.00 per day, because it coincided with what we would have had to pay if we stayed in a comparable same situation on the commercial market, if one was available to enable me to get to work without great expense and inconvenience and more than usual discomfort and stress with moving and other circumstances associated with a PCS [permanent change of station] move." A claimant is not automatically entitled to recover the maximum allowances and available commercial rates. The applicable regulations, the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), dictate a general rule for reimbursement of temporary quarters expenses: "Reimbursement will be limited to actual expenses incurred, not to exceed the maximum authorized, providing expenses are directly related to occupancy of temporary quarters, are reasonable as to amount, and can be substantiated." JTR C13000. Determinations by the Comptroller General provide guidance as to what constitutes "reasonable as to amount." E.g., Andres Tobar, B-209109 (Dec. 15, 1982); Constance A. Hackathorn, B-205579 (June 21, 1982). Particularly when considering rates charged by a private establishment, the reasonableness of the rate charged may be supported by evidence such as an established price for which the owner customarily rents the rooms or demonstrating that the rates were established in a purely business arrangement. The information supplied demonstrates that the agreed upon thirty-day rate of $2,100 was reached at Mr. Massey's request in reliance on his understanding of commercial rates. Although Mr. Massey has referenced family circumstances which support his determination to live in the temporary quarters he chose, the circumstances are unrelated to the established rate. Nothing in the information submitted suggests that Mr. Massey could not have acquired the accommodations for $1,000 per thirty-day period; rather, it appears that the owners were willing to rent the accommodations for $1,000 per month, the amount the agency has reimbursed Mr. Massey. His offer of $2,100 to the owners may have been generous, but in no way compels the Government to reimburse the additional amount. The claimant may not recover the amount sought. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge