_________________ December 12, 1997 _________________ GSBCA 14202-RELO In the Matter of CHARLOTTE ADAMS COOK Charlotte Adams Cook, Folsom, LA, Claimant. Eva C. Matthews, Directorate of Civilian Personnel, United States Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL, appearing for Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. Regulations permit the cost-bearing activity to transfer authority to the gaining activity to amend a travel authorization, such that the gaining activity was authorized to extend the time period for the claimant to sell her residence and obtain reimbursement in connection with a permanent change of station. The extension did not involve the expenditure of additional funds compared to the initial authorization; therefore, the extension was valid without the explicit approval of the cost-bearing activity. The claimant, Charlotte Adams Cook, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, undertook a permanent change of station (PCS) in lieu of separation under a reduction in force (RIF), reporting to her new duty station in September 1992. The PCS authorization specifies: "Reimbursement of expenses associated with the sale of residence will not exceed 10% of the actual sale price or $20,115 whichever is smaller." In order for the claimant to be reimbursed the real estate expenses associated with the sale of her residence, the settlement had to occur within two years of her reporting date, unless, within a stated time period, "extended by the commanding officer of the activity bearing the cost, or his/her designee for an additional period of time not to exceed 1 year." Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) C14000-B. The travel authorization specifies: "Gaining office has authority to amend this travel order." Prior to the expiration of two years, the claimant submitted a request to the gaining activity for an extension of one year for the sale of her residence. The gaining activity granted the request without seeking approval from the losing/cost-bearing activity. The claimant sold her residence within the extended period for $45,000, and seeks reimbursement of $4,685. The cost-bearing activity (here the losing activity given the potential RIF, JTR C1052-B.2), has refused to reimburse the real estate expenses associated with the sale of the residence. It maintains that the claimant lacks authorization to be reimbursed. It asserts that the purported extension of the two- year period is invalid because the gaining activity lacked authority to grant such a request. Further, it contends that the claimant failed to request an extension of time from the cost- bearing activity within the period required under regulation; it concludes, therefore, that the regulations prohibit reimbursement. The JTR addresses who may issue travel orders, stating in part, "an official to whom order issuance authority is delegated may request issuance of a travel order by another such official provided that authorizations and accounting information are included with the request. Prior approval and restrictive conditions are indicated in the delegation of authority tables." JTR C3000. Applicable regulations state that the "gaining activity is responsible for travel orders issuance but may request the losing activity to issue the order." JTR C3000, Department of the Army, n.5. Applicable regulations also specify: "Before issuance of a travel order amendment involving the expenditure of additional funds, approval is required from the official whose funds are affected." JTR C3053-4.b (since redesignated, now JTR 3053-D.2). The Board concludes that the travel authorization and extension were valid. The validity of the initial authorization is not in dispute. The JTR permits an official to request another official with like authority within the Department of the Army to issue travel orders. Thus, the transfer of authority to amend the order, found in the travel authorization, is in keeping with JTR C3000. The regulations do require approval from the official whose funds are affected prior to the issuance of an amendment, but only for an amendment involving the expenditure of additional funds. Here, additional funds were not committed, because the initial travel authorization allocated up to $20,115 for sale of residence costs. That figure was not altered by the amendment. In conclusion, the gaining activity's extension of the period within which to sell a residence is permitted by regulation and falls within the initial travel authorization and the delegation of authority to amend the order found therein. The claimant is entitled to be reimbursed for costs associated with the sale of her residence. The cost-bearing activity must determine which of the requested costs are reasonable and reimbursable under the travel authorization and applicable regulations (which also contain a 10% of the sale price limitation) and reimburse the claimant accordingly. JTR C1052-B.2 ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge