Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 ________________ April 21, 1998 ________________ GSBCA 14299-RELO In the Matter of CHARLES E. PIPER Charles E. Piper, Orlando, FL, Claimant. Gerald L. Matney, Chief, Travel and Transportation, Office of Inspector General, Department of Defense, Arlington, VA, appearing for Department of Defense. PARKER, Board Judge. When Mr. Charles Piper, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense (DoD), was transferred from Collierville, Tennessee to Orlando, Florida, he incurred a three percent "VA funding fee" in connection with the purchase of his new home in Orlando. According to literature from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) submitted along with Mr. Piper's claim, the VA generally charges a funding fee of two percent to persons who obtain VA loans in purchasing homes, and a funding fee of three percent to veterans who are using their VA entitlement for a second or subsequent time. The VA loan which Mr. Piper obtained to purchase the house in Orlando was the second use of his VA entitlement. DoD disallowed Mr. Piper's claim for reimbursement of the three percent fee because, according to the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), VA funding fees are not reimbursable. Mr. Piper has asked the Board to review DoD's decision. Mr. Piper argues that the additional one percent fee charged by the VA is not really a funding fee but a penalty for using the VA loan benefit a second time. Mr. Piper maintains that, since the Government forced him to incur this penalty (by transferring him), the Government should reimburse him for it. Discussion Paragraph C14002 of the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), entitled "ALLOWABLE EXPENSES FOR SALE OR PURCHASE OF RESIDENCE," provides as follows: b. Nonreimbursable Items. Except as otherwise provided in subpar. A, the following items of expense aren't reimbursable: (7) VA funding fee (64 Comp. Gen. 674 (1985)). The citation in the regulation is to a decision by the Comptroller General which held that a VA funding fee is "'a guarantee or insurance protecting the creditor against the consumer's default o[r] other credit loss,' and, thus, a finance charge . . . ." Anders Flodin, 64 Comp. Gen. 674, 678 (1985). Mr. Piper's argument that the extra one percent charged by the VA for second and subsequent uses of the VA loan entitlement is really a penalty and not a funding fee is simply without support. The VA clearly refers to the three percent charge as a funding fee; Mr. Piper has provided no evidence to the contrary. Because the JTR specifically prohibits reimbursement of VA funding fees, Mr. Piper's claim must be denied. _________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge