Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 _______________________________________________ June 26, 1998 _______________________________________________ GSBCA 14505-RELO In the Matter of DAVID B. DAPKUS David B. Dapkus, Arab, AL, Claimant. Robert H. Garfield, Chief, General Law Division, United States Army Aviation and Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, AL, appearing for Department of the Army. BORWICK, Board Judge. Under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program, in February 1997, the United States Army transferred claimant, David B. Dapkus, from St. Louis, Missouri, to Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama . The agency granted claimant reimbursement of permanent change of station (PCS) expenses, including real estate "authorized per JTR [the Joint Travel Regulations]." Before the move, the agency distributed pamphlets and advice to its employees essentially informing them that entitlements were to be based upon the JTR; when the agency discussed a particular entitlement, it referenced the JTR provision applicable to that entitlement. Claimant sold his house in Missouri and purchased a house in Alabama. He financed his purchase with a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mortgage loan and incurred a VA funding fee expense of $3,975. He seeks reimbursement of that amount. The agency denied the claim because the VA funding fee expense was not reimbursable under the JTR. Claimant maintains that, because transfers under the BRAC program were "forced moves," the JTR does not apply. The JTR specifically lists VA funding fees as a non reimbursable item of expense. JTR C14002-A.4.b.(7). We have consistently held that the VA funding fee is a non reimbursable expense under both the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)[foot #] 1 and the JTR. Charles E. Piper, GSBCA 14299-RELO (Apr. 21, 1998); Peter C. Wagner, GSBCA 13907-RELO, 97-1 BCA 28,793. The provisions of the JTR apply to Department of Defense civilian officials and their employees. JTR C1000. While we sympathize with claimant concerning his forced move, there is no statutory or regulatory exception to the VA funding fee prohibition for those employees whom the agency transferred under the BRAC program. [foot #] 2 Claimant is not entitled to recover. __________________________ ANTHONY S. BORWICK Board Judge ----------- FOOTNOTE BEGINS --------- [foot #] 1 The applicable provision of the FTR is found at 41 CFR 302-6.2(d)(1)(i) (1997). [foot #] 2 Claimant initially maintained that he was told at town-hall meetings that all expenses incurred because of the BRAC move were reimbursable. In a later letter to this Board, claimant states that "my appeal is not based on what we were told or the handouts we received." The Government is not bound to pay monies for expenses incurred by its employees' oral or written advice that violates statutory or regulatory prohibitions. Kevin _____ S. Foster, GSBCA 13639-RELO, 97-1 BCA 24,688. Regardless of _________ the oral advice presented at the town-hall meetings, the written information provided the employees was clear and correct in stating that entitlements were to be determined by the JTR.