Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 ___________________ September 22, 1998 ___________________ GSBCA 14646-RELO In the Matter of RICHARD E. BACKLUND Richard E. Backlund, Falls Church, VA, Claimant. A. Thomas Park, Chief, Finance Division, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, appearing for Department of Transportation. PARKER, Board Judge. In June 1998, Richard E. Backlund, an employee of the Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration, was transferred from Boston, Massachusetts, to Washington, D.C. The purchasers of Mr. Backlund's house in Boston insisted as a condition of sale that Mr. Backlund leave behind a home security system which had been installed in the house. As a result, Mr. Backlund was required to pay $785 to the company which had installed the equipment as part of a security services contract. According to Mr. Backlund's real estate agent, the security system was a wireless unit that could easily have been removed and transported to the new duty station. Mr. Backlund claimed as a miscellaneous expense the $785 that he paid the security services company for leaving the equipment. When the agency denied the claim, he asked that the Board review the decision. As discussed below, we find that the agency correctly denied the claim. Discussion The miscellaneous expenses allowance is for defraying various costs associated with discontinuing residence at one location and establishing residence at a new location in connection with an authorized or approved permanent change of station. 41 CFR 302-3.1(a) (1997). The types of costs covered include such things as fees for disconnecting and connecting appliances, cutting and fitting rugs moved from one residence to another, unrefunded utility fees or deposits, forfeiture losses on medical, dental and other non-transferrable contracts, and costs of automobile registration and driver's license. 41 CFR 302-3.1(b). The miscellaneous expenses allowance does not cover, among other things, "[l]osses in selling or buying real and personal property and cost items related to such transactions" or "[l]osses as the result of the sale or disposal of items of personal property not considered convenient or practical to move." 41 CFR 302-3.1(c). The agency was correct in denying Mr. Backlund's claim for the cost of a security system which he left behind as a condition of sale. As is evident from the regulations, costs covered by the miscellaneous expenses allowance tend to be those unavoidable expenses of moving which have nothing to do with the bargain struck between the buyer and seller. Here, in contrast, Mr. Backlund's agreement to leave the security system behind was very much a part of the bargaining process which resulted in the sale of his house. In essence, it was an agreement to lower the price of the house by $785 or, alternatively, to sell personal property with that value in conjunction with the sale of the house. In either case, the agency was correct in determining that such a transaction does not create a reimbursable miscellaneous expense. Decision The claim is denied. __________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge