Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 _________________ April 21, 1999 _________________ GSBCA 14884-RELO In the Matter of LARRY CUNNINGHAM Larry Cunningham, Madison, AL, Claimant. Lt. Col. B. C. Dawson, Deputy Director, Finance Operations, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis, MO, appearing for Department of Defense. PARKER, Board Judge. When Larry Cunningham, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense (DoD), was transferred from Germany to Alabama in November 1998, he brought with him a 1996 Volvo which he had purchased while overseas. In order to register the vehicle in Alabama, Mr. Cunningham was required to pay state and local sales taxes totaling $1113. Alabama charged the sales taxes because the vehicle had never been registered in the United States and no sales tax had ever been paid. DoD denied Mr. Cunningham s claim for reimbursement of the sales taxes because it determined that the taxes were imposed upon Mr. Cunningham . . . due to his desire to own a vehicle[,] not because of his permanent change of station move. DoD also justified its denial of the claim on the basis that its payment of $350 to Mr. Cunningham for miscellaneous expenses is the maximum amount allowed for an employee without dependents. Mr. Cunningham has asked that the Board review DoD s decision. Discussion Reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with the registration of an automobile is covered by the miscellaneous expense allowance: The purpose of MEA [miscellaneous expense allowance] is to pay various costs associated with an authorized/approved . . . residence relocation. . . . Examples of reimbursable costs include (but aren t limited to) the costs of: . . . 5. Automobile registration, driver s license and taxes imposed when bringing automobiles into some jurisdictions . . . . Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) C9000-5. Automobile sales taxes imposed as a condition of registering a vehicle brought to the new duty station have long been considered to be reimbursable as miscellaneous expenses. Dolores T. Hodges, B-173365 (Sept. 3, 1971). There is no exception of which we are aware for sales taxes imposed because a vehicle had never been registered in the United States. Given that the JTR contemplates reimbursing employees for certain automobile-related expenses, including taxes imposed when bringing an automobile to the new duty station, we do not understand DoD s statement that payment of the automobile sales taxes was due to his desire to own a vehicle[,] not because of his permanent change of station move. Clearly, the opposite is true: Mr. Cunningham had to pay the taxes only because he was transferred to a jurisdiction which imposed them as a condition of registering his vehicle. DoD s first reason for declining to reimburse Mr. Cunningham lacks a reasonable basis. DoD also denied Mr. Cunningham s claim for reimbursement of the taxes because it paid him a miscellaneous expense allowance of $350, which DoD maintains is the maximum. Again, DoD misreads the regulations. For employees without dependents, the lesser of $350 or one week s basic compensation is the minimum, not the maximum reimbursement for miscellaneous expenses. JTR 9004-A.1. Where, as here, an employee s claim is supported by acceptable evidence of payment, the agency may authorize reimbursement up to an amount equal to one week s basic salary, not to exceed the amount paid to a GS-13, step 10. JTR 9004-B. Decision DoD s decision that Mr. Cunningham may not be reimbursed under current regulations was incorrect. DoD is authorized to reimburse Mr. Cunningham up to an amount equal to one week s basic salary, not to exceed the amount paid to a GS-13, step 10. DoD is ordered to reconsider its decision in accordance with applicable regulations and the guidance contained in this opinion. __________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge