Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 ___________ June 2, 1998 ___________ GSBCA 14476-TRAV In the Matter of RANDY A. MOSELEY Randy A. Moseley, Mesquite, TX, Claimant. A. Thomas Park, Chief, Finance Division, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, appearing for Department of Transportation. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The claimant, who, for temporary duty travel, purchased an airline ticket from a non-Government contract travel agent, may not be reimbursed for the ticket price. The claimant was aware of the limitations on reimbursement, already having received a one-time exception as an infrequent traveler. The purchase of the ticket was not inadvertent. The record does not demonstrate that the traveler had no alternative to the purchase. For temporary duty travel, the claimant, Randy A. Moseley, purchased a round trip ticket for $284 from a non-Government contract travel agent. He made the purchase on July 2, 1996 (on the day he signed his travel authorization), for travel on August 3 and 6, utilizing his own funds. The agency has denied reimbursement because the claimant utilized an unauthorized travel agent and was not authorized to pay for the tickets with other than the agency's credit account. The agency noted that it could not apply an "infrequent traveler" exception because the claimant is a frequent travel, who had previously utilized a one- time exception and was then notified of the restrictions of purchases and limitations on reimbursement. The services of a travel agent may not be used by executive agencies except as specifically provided. 41 CFR 301-15.3(b) (1995). The claimant was not authorized to use a travel agent not under contract with the Government. This claimant was made aware of the restrictions when earlier he had received payment under an "infrequent traveler" exception. 41 CFR 301-15.3(b)(3) and 301-3.4(b). Even if the infrequent traveler exception, 41 CFR 301-3.4(b)(ii) (found under the headings special fares/reduced rates) potentially applies to this claimant, it does not help the claimant. The provision specifies that after a traveler has utilized a one-time exception, "recurrence of such use of travel agents will result in denial of reimbursement unless it can be demonstrated that the traveler had no alternative." The agency properly disallowed the requested reimbursement. The use of a non-Government contract travel agent was not inadvertent. Moreover, the record does not demonstrate that "no alternative" existed to the actual purchase. Rather, given the one-month period between purchase and travel, it appears that the claimant could have purchased a round trip ticket in accordance with the regulation. The regulation specifies that reimbursement will be denied in such circumstances. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge