Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 _______________________________________________ September 28, 1999 _______________________________________________ GSBCA 15062-TRAV In the Matter of DONALD LEAVITT Donald Leavitt, Metairie, LA, Claimant. Gwendolyn B. Nachman, Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District, New Orleans, LA, appearing for Department of the Army. GOODMAN, Board Judge. Claimant, Donald Leavitt, is a civilian employee of the Army Corps of Engineers. In March 1999, claimant traveled to attend a training seminar. Before commencing travel, claimant received authorization from his supervisor and the New Orleans District Transportation Officer to purchase an airline ticket from a non- contract carrier (Delta Airlines). The discounted fare of $211.40 was $378 less than the contract carrier s fare for the same route. In order to receive this discounted fare, claimant joined the Delta Senior Select Savings Plus Club for a fee of $40. Claimant submitted his travel voucher and requested reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket and the $40 fee. The agency reimbursed the claimant the cost of the airline but did not reimburse the $40 fee. Claimant requests review of the agency determination. The relevant regulations read as follows: Should I join a frequent traveler program? Yes. You are encouraged to join frequent traveler programs to realize cost savings or reduce official travel cost. 41 CFR 301-53.2 (1998). May my agency reimburse membership fees in a frequent flyer program? Yes, if the benefits are expected to exceed the cost of membership. Id. 301-53.3. Under the above regulation, it is a discretionary act by the agency to allow reimbursement of the membership fee of a frequent flyer program. The Delta Senior Select Savings Plus Club, as described by claimant, is a frequent travelers program which claimant joined in order to reduce official travel costs. Under the circumstances of this case, it was an abuse of discretion for the agency not to allow reimbursement. Claimant was given prior authorization to purchase the ticket, and presumably would not have done so if he would not receive reimbursement for the cost of joining the program that made the purchase possible. The benefits (the savings of $378) clearly exceeded the cost of membership ($40). For the agency to give claimant prior approval and then refuse to reimburse the cost of joining the program is an abuse of discretion. Claimant is entitled to reimbursement of the $40 fee as long as the benefits of the program that he joined are accepted on behalf of the United States Government, and claimant does not accept the benefits of the program for personal use. 41 CFR 301-53.7. __________________________ ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge